Environmental Protection Agency
January 19, 2010 - 75 FR 2938 - RIN: 2060-AP98 - Download Full Notice: Text | PDF
Based on its reconsideration of the primary and secondary national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for ozone (O
Agency Contact: Ms. Susan Lyon Stone, Health and Environmental Impacts Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code C504-06, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; telephone: 919-541-1146; fax: 919- 541-0237; e-mail: stone.susan@epa.gov.
This is a proposed regulation. Comments were due on March 22, 2010.
Based on its reconsideration of the primary and secondary national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for ozone (O3) set in March 2008, EPA proposes to set different primary and secondary standards then those set in 2008 to provide requisite protections of public health and welfare, repectively. With regard to the primary standard for O3, EPA proposes that the level of the 8-hour primary standard, which was set at 0.075 ppm in the 2008 final rule, should instead be set at a lower level within the range of 0.060 to 0.070 parts per million (ppm), to provide increased protection for children and other "at risk" populations against an array of O3-related adverse health effects that range from decreased lung function and increased respiratory symptoms to serious indicatiors of respiratory morbidity including emergency department visits and hospital admissions for respiratory causes, and possibly cardiovascular-related morbidity as well as total non-accidental and cardiopulmonary mortality. With regard to the secondary O3 standard, which was set identical to the revised primary standard in the 2008 final rule, should instead be a new cumulative, seasonal standard expressed as an annual index of the sum of weighted hourly concentrations, cumulated over 12 hours per day (8 am to 8 pm) during the consecutive 3-month period within the O3 season with the maximum index value, set at a level within the range of 7 to 15 ppm-hours, to provide increased protection against O3-related adverse impacts on vegetation and forested ecosystems.
| Dollar Year | 2006 | |
| Time Horizon (Years) | 20 | |
| Discount Rates | 3% | 7% |
| Expected Costs (Annualized) | NA | $7.6-44 billion |
| Expected Benefits (Annualized) | $6.9-$61 billion | $6.4-53 billion |
| Expected Costs (Total) | Not Reported by Agency | Not Reported by Agency |
| Expected Benefits (Total) | Not Reported by Agency | Not Reported by Agency |
| Net Benefits (Annualized) | -$22 -- $29 billion | -$25 -- $20 billion |
| Net Benefits (Total) | Not Reported by Agency | Not Reported by Agency |
Submit links with information related to this regulation and your link will appear right here on this page. Agency docs, academic and industry reports, news articles are all appropriate.
We want to make OpenRegs.com as useful tool for everyone interested in regulation. Please help us improve by sending us your comments and suggestions.