May 23, 2012 - 77 FR 30766 - RIN: 2127-AK97 - Download Full Notice: Text | PDF
This document proposes to establish a new Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 136 to require electronic stability control (ESC) systems on truck tractors and certain buses with a gross vehicle weight rating of greater than 11,793 kilograms (26,000 pounds). ESC systems in truck tractors and large buses are designed to reduce untripped rollovers and mitigate severe understeer or oversteer conditions that lead to loss of control by using automatic computer- controlled braking and reducing engine torque output. In 2012, we expect that about 26 percent of new truck tractors and 80 percent of new buses affected by this proposed rule will be equipped with ESC systems. We believe that ESC systems could prevent 40 to 56 percent of untripped rollover crashes and 14 percent of loss-of-control crashes. By requiring that ESC systems be installed on truck tractors and large buses, this proposal would prevent 1,807 to 2,329 crashes, 649 to 858 injuries, and 49 to 60 fatalities at less than $3 million per equivalent life saved, while generating positive net benefits.
Agency Contact: For technical issues, you may contact George Soodoo, Office of Crash Avoidance Standards, by telephone at (202) 366-4931, and by fax at (202) 366-7002. For legal issues, you may contact David Jasinski, Office of the Chief Counsel, by telephone at (202) 366-2992, and by fax at (202) 366-3820. You may send mail to both of these officials at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
This is a proposed regulation.
Regulation establishes a new Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No.136 to require electronic stability control (ESC) systems on truck tractors and certain buses with a gross vehicle weight rating of greater than 11,793 kilograms (26,000 pounds). Electronic Stability Control systems in truck tractors and large buses are designed to reduce untripped rollovers and mitigate severe understeer or oversteer conditions that lead to loss of control by using automatic computer-controlled braking and reducing engine torque output.
The standard is recommended based on a benefit-cost study of three different command-and-control options without any serious discussion of why all heavy vehicles have not previously come equipped with Electronic Stability Control technology in recent years or why the industry would not have evolved to make this technology the norm or even come up with better technology. The NPRM has an engineering focus and does not address behavioral responses particularly well.
| Dollar Year | 2010, millions | |
| Time Horizon (Years) | Not Reported by Agency | |
| Discount Rates | 3% | 7% |
| Expected Costs (Annualized) | $113.6 | $113.6 |
| Expected Benefits (Annualized) | $341.9 - $422.8 | $268 - $336.1 |
| Expected Costs (Total) | Not Reported by Agency | Not Reported by Agency |
| Expected Benefits (Total) | Not Reported by Agency | Not Reported by Agency |
| Net Benefits (Annualized) | $228.3 - $309.2 | $154.4 - $222.5 |
| Net Benefits (Total) | Not Reported by Agency | Not Reported by Agency |
Submit links with information related to this regulation and your link will appear right here on this page. Agency docs, academic and industry reports, news articles are all appropriate.
We want to make OpenRegs.com as useful tool for everyone interested in regulation. Please help us improve by sending us your comments and suggestions.